Comparison of Land Cover/Land Use and Habitat classification systems for Habitat mapping from space: strengths and weaknesses evidenced in Mediterranean sites of Natura 2000 network
Tomaselli V, Dimopoulos P, Marangi C, Kallimanis AS, Adamo M, Tarantino C, Panitsa M, Terzi M, Veronico G, Lovergine F, Nagendra H, Lucas R, Mairota P, Mà¼cher CA, Blonda P
In: “o MS.MONINA/BIO_SOS conjoint conference on "Ecosystem and Biodiversity Monitoring - best practice in Europe and globally" (EO4Hab) GI_FORUM”. Salzburg, July 3-5 2013. vde verlag GMBH, berlino -offenbach (DEU), pp. 560-563. [ISBN: 978-3-87907-532-4] (2013) doi: 10.1553/giscience2013s560 URL: http://hw.oeaw.ac.at/0xc1aa500d_0x002e6e93.pdf
At a global level, protected sites have been established for the primary purpose of conserving biodiversity, with survey and monitoring of habitats undertaken largely within their boundaries. However, because of increasing human populations with greater access to resources, there is a need to now consider monitoring anthropic activities in the surrounding landscapes as pressures and disturbances are impacting on the functioning and biodiversity values of many protected sites. Earth Observation (EO) data acquired across a range of spatial and temporal scales offer new opportunities for monitoring biodiversity over varying time-scales, either through direct or indirect mapping of species or habitats. However, Land Cover (LC) and/or Land Use (LU), rather than habitat maps are generated in many national and international programs and, whilst the translation from one classification to the other is desirable, differences in definitions and criteria have so far limited the establishment of a unified approach. Focusing on both natural and non-natural environments associated with Natura 2000 sites in the Mediterranean, this paper considers the extent to which three common LC/LU taxonomies (CORINE, the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) Land Cover Classification System (FAO-LCCS) and the IGBP) can be translated to habitat taxonomies with minimum use of additional environmental attributes and/or in situ data. A qualitative and quantitative analysis based on the Jaccard’s index established the FAOLCCS as being the most useful taxonomy for harmonizing LC/LU maps with different legends and dealing with the complexity of habitat description and as a framework for translating EO-derived LC/LU to habitat categories. As demonstration, a habitat map of a wetland site is obtained through translation of the LCCS taxonomy.
